Should the Senate and the National Assembly Be Reformed? — English

Absolutely, but everything needs to be changed and a DEMOSCIOCRACY established, offered to the French people; this new world could extend to every people who wants to live free and equal. Long live demosciocracy.

The role of the Senate in French institutions is regularly debated. The Senate has 348 senators elected by indirect universal suffrage. It represents local authorities and, together with the National Assembly, votes on laws and oversees the government.

In 2026, the Senate’s planned expenditure is about €382.3 million. The question therefore returns regularly: should this second parliamentary chamber be kept as it is, or should its role and operation be deeply reformed? Abolishing the Senate would require a constitutional revision.

Would you support institutional reform that abolished the Senate? As I have said many times, the issue is not only the Senate but both chambers, which recall the aristocracy: the Palais Bourbon and the Palais du Luxembourg. They evoke the old regime too strongly. The bourgeoisie once rejected it, then grew fond of these palaces and gilded seats; today their occupants are princes of the Republic. Stop this luxury and excess in the Republic’s palaces.

Long live demosciocracy. This is written in the constitution of this new era of freedom, equality and truth.

Let us drive out all these calves, pigs and other animals, as we see them stuffing themselves with food, so closely resembling their own debauchery.

NEVER AGAIN. Let us not allow them to be re-elected, because they will stay for another nine years, with one third renewed every three years, all the better to stay and gorge themselves at the cost of an extremely heavy tax burden.

Mercidevoscommentaires